Table of Contents
Author: Dinara Akhmerova
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6781-4410
UDC 159.923:77
Abstract
The perception of one’s own photographic image is influenced not only by the visual characteristics of the photograph itself but also by the individual’s distribution of attention throughout the photographic process. Previous observations demonstrated that people frequently evaluate their own portraits much more critically than external observers, suggesting that factors beyond image quality contribute to self-perception.
The present article explores attention as a possible mechanism underlying these differences. Based on long-term professional observations conducted during portrait photography sessions, the paper examines how attention changes before the session, during image creation, and while viewing the final photographs. Particular attention is given to bodily sensations, emotional reactions, and visual feedback as interconnected elements of the photographic experience.
The article proposes that consciously directing attention during portrait photography, together with subsequent observation of one’s emotional and bodily responses, may contribute to a more reflective and less automatic perception of one’s own image. The proposed conceptual framework is intended as a theoretical basis for further empirical investigation rather than as a therapeutic model.
1. Introduction
Portrait photography is traditionally understood as a process of creating a visual representation of a person. However, professional practice demonstrates that photographing involves considerably more than producing an image. Throughout every portrait session, individuals continuously interpret themselves, evaluate their appearance, monitor their emotional state, anticipate the opinions of others, and react to the presence of the camera.
In a previous theoretical paper, the author described recurring observations indicating that many individuals perceive their own photographs considerably more critically than external observers. Those observations suggested that dissatisfaction with personal photographs cannot always be explained by the objective quality of the image. Instead, they pointed toward the possible influence of internal psychological factors affecting the interpretation of visual information.
One important question nevertheless remained unanswered.
What determines the way people perceive their own photographs?
Repeated observations during portrait sessions suggested that the answer might lie not only in the photograph itself but also in the way attention is distributed throughout the photographic process.
Unlike everyday observation in front of a mirror, portrait photography unfolds over time. Before the photograph is created, individuals anticipate the session and imagine possible outcomes. During posing, they alternate between observing their body, following the photographer’s instructions, monitoring facial expression, and evaluating their appearance. After the session, attention shifts once again while viewing the resulting images and comparing them with previously formed expectations.
This continuous movement of attention appears to influence both emotional responses and subsequent evaluation of the photographs.
The present article therefore focuses not on photography as an artistic product but on photography as a dynamic perceptual process occurring before, during, and after image creation.
The purpose of this article is to examine the possible relationship between directed attention, bodily awareness, emotional reactions, and the perception of one’s own photographic image.
The objectives of the study are:
- to analyze how attention changes throughout different stages of portrait photography;
- to examine the relationship between attention and automatic self-evaluation;
- to consider the role of bodily sensations during photographic sessions;
- to explore the camera as an external object organizing attention;
- to analyze visual feedback as a possible factor contributing to increased self-awareness;
- to propose a preliminary conceptual framework describing the interaction between attention, photography, and self-perception.
The discussion presented below is based primarily on long-term qualitative professional observations accumulated during portrait photography sessions involving individuals of different ages, professions, and previous photographic experience. The proposed concepts should therefore be regarded as theoretical observations intended to stimulate further empirical research.
2. Attention During the Photographic Process
One of the most consistent observations made throughout professional portrait practice concerns the instability of attention during image creation.
Individuals rarely maintain a single focus of attention throughout a photographic session. Instead, attention continuously shifts between multiple sources of information. At different moments, participants observe their posture, facial expression, breathing, emotions, clothing, body position, the photographer’s instructions, the camera itself, and anticipated evaluation by others.
These transitions often occur automatically and without conscious awareness.
For example, immediately before the camera shutter is released, a participant may become intensely focused on a perceived facial imperfection. Several seconds later, attention may shift toward uncertainty about posture or concerns regarding how the photograph will appear. Upon viewing the completed image, attention frequently narrows again, concentrating on a single detail while overlooking the composition, emotional expression, or overall visual impression.
Such observations suggest that the perception of personal photographs is influenced not only by what is visually present in the image but also by the particular aspects to which attention has been directed throughout the photographic experience.
Importantly, attention does not appear to remain fixed even after the photograph has been produced. While viewing completed portraits, many individuals repeatedly alternate between global perception of the entire image and selective examination of isolated details. These repeated shifts may substantially influence subsequent emotional responses.
The dynamic nature of attention therefore appears to represent an important characteristic of portrait photography itself rather than merely an individual difference between participants.
3. Automatic and Conscious Attention During Portrait Photography
One of the central observations emerging from long-term portrait practice is that attention appears to operate in two qualitatively different modes throughout the photographic process.
The first mode may be described as automatic attention. In this state, individuals do not consciously choose what to observe. Instead, attention is immediately drawn toward familiar objects of concern. These may include perceived imperfections of the face or body, comparisons with previously seen images, memories of earlier photographic experiences, or anticipated judgments from other people.
Automatic attention often develops rapidly and requires little conscious effort. Participants frequently report that they “immediately noticed” something they disliked without intentionally searching for it. In many cases, attention narrows to a single feature while the overall image remains largely unnoticed.
For example, an individual may evaluate an entire portrait as unsuccessful after focusing exclusively on the position of the shoulders, a facial expression, or a perceived asymmetry. Although the remaining elements of the photograph may be harmonious, the selected detail becomes the dominant object of perception.
Professional observations suggest that this selective allocation of attention frequently precedes conscious evaluation of the photograph itself.
In contrast, conscious attention appears to involve deliberate observation of ongoing experience. Rather than immediately evaluating appearance, individuals intentionally notice multiple aspects of the photographic situation, including posture, breathing, emotional state, bodily sensations, interaction with the photographer, and the image as a whole.
Unlike automatic attention, conscious observation does not eliminate emotional reactions. Instead, it appears to broaden the range of information available for interpretation.
Rather than asking, “Do I like this photograph?”, participants gradually begin asking different questions:
“What am I noticing?”
“Why is this particular detail attracting my attention?”
“What am I feeling while looking at this image?”
This shift does not necessarily produce immediate positive evaluation of the photograph. However, it appears to reduce the dominance of automatic self-criticism and encourages a more reflective interpretation of personal visual experience.
The distinction between automatic and conscious attention may therefore represent an important factor influencing how individuals perceive their own photographs.
4. The Role of Bodily Awareness During Portrait Photography
Portrait photography is generally considered a visual activity. Nevertheless, practical observations suggest that bodily experience plays an equally significant role throughout the photographic session.
Before participants verbally describe their impressions, numerous bodily reactions often become observable. Changes in posture, muscle tension, breathing patterns, facial expression, movement speed, and eye contact frequently occur even before conscious evaluation begins.
Some individuals instinctively hold their breath while posing. Others unconsciously tighten their shoulders, clench their hands, or repeatedly adjust their clothing despite the photographer’s reassurance that no correction is necessary.
Interestingly, these reactions are not limited to inexperienced participants. Similar patterns may also be observed among professional models, public speakers, and individuals accustomed to appearing in front of cameras.
Such observations suggest that the body continuously reflects emotional processes occurring during portrait photography.
From this perspective, bodily sensations may serve as an additional source of information rather than merely accompanying emotional experience.
For example, increasing muscle tension may indicate growing anxiety before any conscious recognition of nervousness occurs. Likewise, gradual relaxation of posture may accompany increasing confidence during the session.
Professional practice also indicates that participants rarely pay attention to these bodily changes unless their awareness is intentionally directed toward them.
Simple observational questions asked during the session often produce noticeable changes in perception:
“How does your breathing feel right now?”
“Where do you notice tension?”
“Has your posture changed since the beginning of the session?”
Rather than attempting to modify these reactions, such questions simply encourage observation.
This distinction appears important.
The purpose is not to control bodily experience but to recognize it as part of the overall photographic process.
When bodily sensations become part of conscious observation, participants frequently describe the session differently. Their attention expands beyond appearance alone and gradually includes the experience of being photographed.
This broader perspective may contribute to a more balanced interpretation of the resulting images.
Importantly, these observations should not be interpreted as evidence that bodily awareness directly changes self-perception. Instead, they suggest that awareness of bodily responses may enrich the process through which individuals interpret their photographic experience.
5. The Camera as an External Object Organizing Attention
Most discussions of portrait photography describe the camera primarily as a technical instrument used to record visual information. However, observations accumulated during professional practice suggest that the presence of a camera influences not only the resulting image but also the organization of attention throughout the photographic session.
Unlike a mirror, which allows continuous self-observation under the individual’s control, the camera introduces an external point of focus around which perception becomes organized. Once a photographic session begins, attention is no longer directed exclusively toward one’s own appearance. Instead, it is continuously redistributed among several simultaneously occurring processes.
Participants observe their posture while listening to the photographer’s instructions. They monitor facial expression while becoming aware of bodily sensations. They anticipate the future photograph while responding emotionally to the present moment.
As a result, attention no longer remains fixed on a single object. Rather, it moves between multiple sources of information that together constitute the photographic experience.
Professional observations indicate that this redistribution of attention may significantly influence how individuals subsequently interpret their own images.
For example, participants whose attention remains focused almost exclusively on appearance often demonstrate immediate evaluative reactions after viewing the photographs. Their comments typically concern isolated visual details, including facial symmetry, body proportions, skin condition, or perceived imperfections.
In contrast, individuals whose attention during the session also includes awareness of posture, breathing, emotional state, interaction with the photographer, or the overall atmosphere frequently describe the resulting photographs in a broader and less exclusively evaluative manner.
These observations do not imply a causal relationship between attention and emotional evaluation. Rather, they suggest that the organization of attention during image creation may represent one of several factors influencing later interpretation of personal photographs.
From this perspective, the camera performs two simultaneous functions. It serves as a technical device for producing an image while also acting as an external reference point that structures perceptual activity throughout the session.
Importantly, the camera itself does not determine where attention is directed. Instead, it creates conditions in which multiple attentional processes occur simultaneously. The photographer, the participant, the environment, and the anticipated image all become elements within a dynamic perceptual system.
This interpretation extends the traditional understanding of portrait photography beyond image production alone and suggests that photographing may also be viewed as a structured process of observation.
6. Photography as a Structured Process of Observation
Long-term professional observations suggest that portrait photography develops through a sequence of interconnected stages rather than as a single moment of image creation. At each stage, attention shifts toward different aspects of experience, while emotional and bodily responses continuously interact with visual perception.
Although individual experiences naturally vary, several recurring stages have been identified across numerous portrait sessions.
The process typically begins before the camera is activated. Participants arrive with expectations, previous experiences, and assumptions regarding the upcoming session. At this stage, attention is often directed toward anticipated evaluation rather than the present moment.
As the session begins, attention gradually expands to include the body. Individuals become aware of posture, facial expression, gestures, breathing, and movement while simultaneously responding to instructions provided by the photographer.
During image creation, attention continues to alternate between internal and external sources of information. Participants observe themselves, react to the photographer, anticipate the resulting photographs, and monitor their own emotional responses. These processes frequently occur simultaneously and often without explicit awareness.
The final stage begins after the photographs are presented. Visual feedback introduces an opportunity to compare internal expectations with an externally recorded image. At this point, attention frequently becomes selective once again, focusing either on the image as a whole or on isolated details that appear personally significant.
The sequence observed during portrait photography may therefore be represented as follows.
Table 1. Sequential Stages of Attention During Portrait Photography
| Stage of the process | Primary focus of attention | Frequently observed reactions |
| Before the session | Expectations and anticipated evaluation | Curiosity, anxiety, uncertainty |
| Beginning of the session | Body position and interaction with the photographer | Increased self-monitoring |
| During photographing | Simultaneous awareness of body, camera, and instructions | Alternating concentration and emotional responses |
| Viewing completed photographs | Personal appearance and comparison with expectations | Evaluation, surprise, self-criticism, acceptance |
| Reflection after viewing | Personal experience as a whole | Increased awareness and interpretation |
It should be emphasized that these stages are not proposed as fixed psychological categories. Rather, they represent a conceptual description of recurring patterns repeatedly observed during portrait photography sessions.
Understanding photography as a structured observational process offers an alternative perspective on portrait practice. Instead of considering the photographic session solely as the production of visual material, it may also be viewed as a sequence of attentional transitions occurring before, during, and after image creation.
This perspective does not replace existing theories of perception or self-awareness. Instead, it provides an organizational framework through which the interaction between attention, bodily experience, emotional reactions, and visual feedback may be examined more systematically.
7. Visual Feedback as a Process of Self-Observation
One characteristic that distinguishes portrait photography from many other forms of visual perception is the delayed presentation of the image. Unlike a mirror, which provides immediate and continuously changing visual information, a photograph creates a temporal interval between experience and observation.
This interval appears to play an important role in how individuals interpret their own appearance.
During the photographic session, participants experience emotions, bodily sensations, expectations, and interactions with the photographer without simultaneously observing themselves. Only after the photograph has been produced do they encounter an external representation of that experience.
Consequently, the completed photograph functions not merely as a visual image but as a form of visual feedback that allows individuals to compare two different perspectives.
The first perspective is internal and subjective. It consists of memories, emotions, bodily sensations, expectations, and personal beliefs experienced during the session.
The second perspective is external and visually recorded. It presents the same moment independently of the participant’s immediate emotional experience.
Professional observations suggest that the comparison between these two perspectives frequently becomes the starting point for self-reflection.
Interestingly, participants often discover that the external image differs substantially from the one they expected to see.
Some individuals anticipate appearing tense but observe confidence.
Others remember feeling uncomfortable while the resulting portrait conveys calmness.
Conversely, participants who experienced confidence during the session occasionally perceive unexpected uncertainty in their expressions.
These discrepancies appear to encourage reflection rather than immediate certainty.
Instead of confirming existing beliefs, the photograph sometimes introduces new questions regarding personal perception.
For this reason, visual feedback may be viewed not simply as confirmation of appearance but as an opportunity to observe the relationship between subjective experience and externally recorded reality.
Importantly, visual feedback does not necessarily change self-perception. Rather, it provides additional information that individuals may incorporate into their existing understanding of themselves.
Repeated professional observations suggest that this process becomes particularly valuable when participants are encouraged to examine the photograph as a whole rather than concentrating exclusively on isolated details.
Such an approach appears to broaden perception and reduce the tendency toward immediate automatic evaluation.
Although these observations remain qualitative, they indicate that visual feedback may represent an important component of future investigations examining the relationship between photography, attention, and self-perception.
8. Discussion
The observations presented in this article extend previous discussions regarding self-perception in portrait photography by considering the possible role of attention throughout the photographic process.
Rather than viewing dissatisfaction with personal photographs solely as a consequence of appearance, the present observations suggest that the organization of attention may significantly influence how individuals interpret their own images.
Throughout portrait sessions, attention appears to move continuously between multiple sources of information, including bodily sensations, emotional experience, interaction with the photographer, anticipated evaluation, and the resulting visual image.
These attentional transitions frequently occur automatically and often remain outside conscious awareness.
The completed photograph subsequently introduces visual feedback that enables comparison between subjective experience and an externally recorded representation.
Taken together, these observations suggest that portrait photography may be understood as a dynamic perceptual process involving continuous interaction between attention, bodily awareness, emotional responses, and visual information.
The present observations do not establish causal relationships between these variables.
Nor do they demonstrate that directing attention necessarily changes self-perception.
Instead, they identify several recurring patterns repeatedly observed during professional photographic practice that appear sufficiently consistent to justify further scientific investigation.
Future empirical studies may examine these relationships using standardized psychological instruments, observational protocols, physiological measurements, and longitudinal research designs.
Such investigations may clarify whether changes in attentional organization are associated with measurable differences in emotional responses or visual self-evaluation during portrait photography.
9. Proposed Conceptual Framework
Based on the observations presented throughout this article, a preliminary conceptual framework is proposed describing the principal components repeatedly observed during portrait photography.
The framework is not intended as a psychological model explaining all aspects of self-perception.
Rather, it serves as a theoretical organization of recurring observations accumulated during professional photographic practice.
Table 2. Preliminary Conceptual Framework of the Portrait Photography Process
| Component | Function within the photographic process |
| Body | Source of continuous sensory information including posture, movement, breathing, and muscular tension |
| Attention | Selects which aspects of experience become consciously perceived |
| Emotional responses | Accompany interpretation of both internal experience and external evaluation |
| Camera | External object organizing perceptual activity during image creation |
| Photograph | Provides delayed visual feedback independent of immediate subjective experience |
| Reflection | Integrates visual, emotional, and bodily information into conscious interpretation |
The proposed framework illustrates that portrait photography involves considerably more than image production alone.
Instead, it may be understood as an interaction between several continuously changing perceptual processes occurring before, during, and after image creation.
Further research will be required to determine the extent to which these relationships may be experimentally verified.
10. Conclusion
Portrait photography has traditionally been regarded as a means of documenting visual appearance. The observations presented in this article suggest that the photographic process may also represent a structured sequence of attentional, emotional, bodily, and perceptual events.
Professional observations indicate that attention continuously shifts throughout portrait sessions, moving between appearance, bodily sensations, emotional experience, interaction with the photographer, and anticipation of the resulting image. These attentional transitions appear to influence how individuals subsequently interpret their own photographs.
The delayed presentation of the completed image introduces visual feedback that allows comparison between subjective experience and an externally recorded representation. Rather than functioning solely as a visual record, the photograph may therefore provide an opportunity for increased awareness of habitual patterns of self-observation and evaluation.
The conceptual framework proposed in this article should be regarded as a preliminary theoretical model derived from qualitative professional observations. It is intended to stimulate future empirical research rather than to provide definitive explanations of the psychological mechanisms involved.
Further investigation may contribute to a broader interdisciplinary understanding of the relationship between portrait photography, attention, bodily awareness, emotional responses, and self-perception.
References
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
- Cash, T. F. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body image. In T. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice (pp. 38–46). Guilford Press.
- Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York, NY: Scribner’s.
- Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.
- Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace.
- Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
- Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press.
- James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge.
- Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59.
- Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
- Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin.
- Sontag, S. (1977). On Photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Tiggemann, M. (2015). Considerations of positive body image across various social identities and special populations. Body Image, 14, 168–176.